I was sipping my morning tea when the news arrived—not like
a whisper, but like a siren through my chest. Another terror attack, this time
in Pahalgam. The moment felt heartbreakingly familiar. My heart clenched not
just with pain, but with exhaustion. It wasn’t just grief—it was the weight of
decades. I asked myself, how many times must we bury our dead before the world
sees the truth? How many times must we call this a beginning, when we know this
war never truly ends?
India’s response came swiftly—Operation Sindoor. And
what a name. Not just a military label, but a metaphor. Sindoor—that sacred
streak of red across a woman’s hairline, a mark of life, of promise, of
protection. But also, the first drop of blood, symbolic of every sacrifice made
for the sanctity of the nation. This was not war for war’s sake; this was a
reply rooted in the soil of rage and reverence. India didn’t just retaliate—it
restored balance. With S-400 air defense systems, Akash missiles, and the
precision of Made in India firepower, the world watched a new era of Indian
military resolve unfold. Even the Rafale jets, though foreign-built, bore the
resolve of a nation that refuses to kneel—and ironically, their manufacturer’s
stock market shares soared the very next day.
Pakistan, as expected, responded with rage but not reason.
Drones, missiles, propaganda. Yet all of it imported—tools borrowed, intent
outsourced, logic missing. Their machinery may fire, but it does not speak with
the voice of a nation that owns its ground. Perhaps that’s the difference.
Then came the fog—confusing statements, sudden mediations.
The United States, which just days earlier insisted it would not
interfere in a bilateral matter, suddenly declared it had “successfully
mediated” a ceasefire. I frowned. Had peace come wrapped in paperwork or in
politics? What changed between “we will not intervene” and “we made it happen”?
The answer, it seems, lies not on maps but in backchannels.
Pakistan, in a press conference, proudly announced
its agreement to the ceasefire.Curiously, it did thank the US, but it extended special thanks to China.".
As if the puppet was caught mid-performance and accidentally revealed the
puppeteer. And then—fifteen minutes later—drones took off again from Pakistani
soil. Into Kashmir, into Rajasthan. Into the heart of irony.
But India? India didn’t rush to the microphone. India didn’t
clap for diplomacy dressed as deception. Instead, India said—“We will see.” And
today, as I write this, the Indian security council is in a closed-door meeting
scheduled for 12 noon. The ceasefire, you see, may have signatures—but it does
not yet have India's consent.
I asked myself—why would Pakistan, so full of bravado,
suddenly agree to de-escalate? A few thoughts swirled in my mind.
Could it be that their fuel reserves are dwindling under
global economic pressure? Or that their weapons systems failed, unable to
withstand India’s homegrown tech? Could the damage from Operation Sindoor have
been far worse than what their press admits? Or maybe, just maybe, it was the
work of our Foreign Minister and diplomatic team, who played their roles not
with loud declarations but with cold precision. Silent diplomacy is still
warfare—only quieter, sharper.
One image stood out to me during this entire crisis—two
Indian women officers handling the national media briefings with clarity,
composure, and command. Their eyes carried resolve, their posture grace, their
speech—fact. No theatrics, no drama. And across the border? A nation where
women are often pushed behind veils and walls, suddenly seemed confused to see
power draped in a saree or a crisp uniform.
Even on international channels, Pakistan stumbled. Their
Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, in a CNN interview, when asked about proof of
shooting down Indian jets, simply said, “It’s all over social media.” No
satellite images, no technical details—just hashtags and hollow noise. The host
raised an eyebrow. The world trolled him for days. And when he admitted that
Pakistan had trained militants for the US during the Afghan war—it didn’t feel
like a revelation. It felt like a confession long overdue.
Meanwhile, India spoke less—but stood taller.
And what if this war had escalated? The economists are
already running simulations. In less than a week, the global oil markets
fluctuated by 9%, stock markets in Europe dipped by 3.4%, and several
multinational supply chains reported disruption concerns. Had this continued, a
regional war could have shaved off over $1.5 trillion from global GDP within
weeks, according to projections from London-based risk analysts. Already shaken
by conflicts elsewhere, the world knew—South Asia cannot afford to burn.
Yet, the world rarely asks—why do we let this happen again
and again? Pakistan, the shelter of Bin Laden, the cradle of Dawood Ibrahim,
the playground of Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and dozens more—was
removed from the FATF grey list. Why? Why did IMF approve another bailout
package despite knowing that their military gets the lion’s share of those
funds?
Both India and Pakistan were born from the same historical
midnight in 1947. But one chose to rise, and the other to rot in its own
denial. India today leads in technology, healthcare, space exploration, and
even diplomacy. CEOs of Google, Microsoft, Adobe, IBM—all sons of this soil.
And Pakistan? It produces terrorists, angry anchors and borrowed missiles.
I do not write this as a warrior. I write this as a witness.
A citizen watching her country bleed quietly, retaliate fiercely, and speak
wisely. A ceasefire isn’t peace. It’s just a pause in the noise. And this time,
India is choosing whether to press “Play” or “Stop.”
Let the world not mistake silence for surrender. We are a
patient nation, yes. But we are not a passive one.
Let Operation Sindoor remind the world—we bleed, but we
rise. Always.
Comments
Post a Comment